T. N. VALLINAYAGAM, J.

( 1 ) THE defendant in a suit for recovery of money based on two invoices is questioning the decree passed by the trial court in favour of the plaintiff-company. The fact that the supply was made under two invoices by the plaintiff-company is not in dispute. On the other hand, in the written statement, the points that are raised are :

(1) The suit is based on account and account copy is not produced ; (2) The fabricated frames were not up to expected standard. The defendant was prepared to return the copies as sub-standard goods ; (3) The suit was not verified by person authorised in law to verify and sign the pleadings ; (4) The question of payment of interest does not arise, as there is no question of payment of principal dues. The trial court considering the evidence adduced by PW-1 and the documents filed by the plaintiff exhibits P1 to P5 and also taking into consideration the evidence of DW-1 with no documents to file as exhibit came to the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for and also granted interest at 18 per cent. p. a. Mr. Sampath Kumar, appearing for the petitioner submitted that the company has not been represented

Click Here to Read the rest of this document