SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Kar) 205

K.SREEDHAR RAO, G.C.BHARUKA
UNITED BREWERIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KARNATAKA BANK LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ) THE appeal is filed against the order passed in exhibit No. 631 of 1991 on the file of the 19th additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore. The appellant is the garnishee. The first respondent, karnataka Bank, is the decree holder and the other respondents in the appeal are the judgment debtors.

( 2 ) THE material facts relating to the case are stated thus: The first respondent decree holder obtained a decree against the judgment debtors in O. S. No. 1759 of 1988 by virtue of the compromise entered into between the parties. An application came to be made under Order 21, rule 46 for issuance of prohibitory order against the garnishee, the revision petitioner, for a sum of Rs. 5,66,365. 66, pursuant to which the garnishee deposited the amount in the court after contest. Subsequently, the decree holder made an application for directing the garnishee to deposit the accrued interest liability payable under decree in a sum of Rs. 13,70,555. 70. The trial court after hearing the objections, directed the garnishee to deposit the amount of Rs. 13,70,551. 70. Being aggrieved, the garnishee filed the appeal.

( 3 ) THE short questions that arise in the appeal are : (1) whether the liabilit






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top