SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Kar) 177

G.C.BHARUKA, S.R.BANNURMATH
BABU MOTHER SAVAVVA NAVELGUND – Appellant
Versus
GOPINATH – Respondent


BHARUKA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by defendants Nos. 1 and 8 to 15. They are aggrieved by the part of the impugned judgment and decree of the Trial Court by which certain transactions of gift and sales effected by late Shivamurthappa, being the adoptive father of the plaintiff (Respondent herein) as illegal and void and has granted consequential reliefs of permanent injunction in respect of gifted properties and possession in respect of sold properties with future mesne profits from the date of the suit.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the suit properties were ancestral in nature in the hands of late Shivamurthappa which he got in 1941 as a consequence of family partition. He adopted the plaintiff on 1-11-1957 under a registered deed of adoption after observing the customary ceremonies. Subsequently on 3-4-1979 Shivamurthappa died. His wife had died much earlier to the date of adoption of the plaintiff. He had kept the mother of the first defendant as concubine in his house.

( 3 ) IT also bears out from the evidence recorded during the course of the trial that the house property being item No. 1 of Schedule A to the plaint was gifted by Shivamurthappa under a registered dee












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top