SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Kar) 637

Karnataka High Court
Judges : Ashok Bhan,S.R.Venkatesha Murthy
PSI DATA SYSTEM LTD. - Appellant
Versus
ASSTT.COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - Respondent
Writ Appeal 3392 Of 1998
Decided On : 09/18/1998
Advocates Appeared :
S.N.MURTHY

After the determination of duty, it is not possible to relinquish the title in goods, and customs authorities have jurisdiction to determine duty after a lapse of time indicating lack of interest in the goods.

Headnote:

Customs Act - Sections 23(2) and 86 - Relinquishment of Title in Goods

Fact of the Case:

The appellant sought to relinquish the title in goods after a lapse of time, but the customs authorities determined the duty and refused the relinquishment.

Finding of the Court:

The court agreed with the reasoning of the Single Judge, stating that after the determination of duty, it is not possible to relinquish the title in goods, especially after a lapse of time indicating lack of interest in keeping the goods in the warehouse.

Issues: Relinquishment of title in goods after determination of duty, customs authorities' jurisdiction to determine duty after lapse of time.

Ratio Decidendi: Sections 23(2) and 86 of the Customs Act lead to the conclusion that after duty determination, relinquishment of title in goods is not possible, and customs authorities have jurisdiction to determine duty after a lapse of time indicating lack of interest in the goods.

Final Decision: The appellant's appeal was dismissed, upholding the customs authorities' determination of duty and refusal to permit relinquishment of title in the goods.

( 1 ) WE agree with the reasoning adopted by the learned Single Judge. The appellant could not be allowed to relinquish the title in goods after the lapse of a number of years. Sections 23 (2) and 86 of Customs Act read jointly leads to the conclusion that after the determination of the duty, it is not possible to relinquish the title in goods. After the lapse of time, for keeping the goods in the warehouse it has to be presumed that the importer is no longer interested in keeping the goods in the warehouse and the customs authorities are within their jurisdiction to determine the duty. The order of determination of duty not being in dispute, the appellant could not be permitted to relinquish his title in the goods. We have considered this matter earlier against a similar order passed by the same Judge which was upheld by us. Dismissed.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top