SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Kar) 324

M.P.CHINNAPPA
BANK OF BARODA – Appellant
Versus
M. SUNDARA RAJAN – Respondent


M. P. CHINNAPPA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners herein are the accused before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore, in c. C. No. 8206 of 1996, for the alleged offence under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The chief manager, chairman, managing director and directors of Bank of Baroda are the accused persons. They have preferred these petitions against the order passed by the learned magistrate directing to issue process to these petitioners. Heard.

( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners contended that the complaint was without any bona fide reasons. If the complaint is taken as a whole, no offence is made out as against these petitioners. There is no dishonest intention on the part of these petitioners to constitute an offence under section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. These petitioners were not concerned with the transaction as on the date of the alleged incident. Therefore, he submitted that the learned magistrate has not applied his judicial mind in taking cognizance of the offence. Therefore, the petitioners are entitled to be discharged.

( 3 ) PER contra, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that all these contentions can be raised only before

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top