M.F.SALDANHA
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. , LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SHANTABAI AND ORS. – Respondent
( 1 ) THE three claims that are the subject matter of these appeals relate to an incident that occurred on 1. 10. 1986 at 2. 30 A. M. when a truck No. CAA 330 which was carrying stones capsized. Of the three coolies who were travelling in the vehicle, 2 died and 1 was injured giving raise to three claims being filed before the M. A. C. T. , Gulbarga. The case of the claimants was that respondent 1 who was the son of respondent 2 (owner of the truck) was driving the vehicle and that because of his rashness and negligence the accident occurred. It was also contended that respondent No. 3 namely National Insurance Co. was liable because the vehicle was insured by respondent No. 3. The respondents 1 and 2 filed a written statement in which they contended that respondent 1 was not driving the vehicle and that one Murugesh was in fact driving it. It is relevant to point out that respondents 1 and 2 though represented by a lawyer did not participate in the proceedings in so far as neither of them gave any evidence. I have recounted these details because they are of some consequences. As far as Respondent 3 is concerned, the usual plea was taken that the vehicle was not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.