SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Kar) 81

R.V.RAVEENDRAN
RAJU REDDY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, BDA – Respondent


R. V. RAVEENDRAN, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner claims that he is the owner of Survey No. 52 of Hennur Village, Kasaba Hobli, bangalore North Taluk, measuring 1 Acre 33 Guntas; that he had put up six structures in the said property during the year 1980; that the Village Panchayat had assessed the structures to property tax by assigning the No. 235/a (1 to 6) in the Assessment Register for the period 1989-90 and had received tax from him for 1990-91; that petitioner applied to B. D. A. (Respondent) for regularisation of the constructions on 10. 11. 1992 (vide Annexures E1 and E2) and the said application is not yet disposed of; that though the property was acquired by BDA, as he has already put up constructions prior to 31. 3. 1990, the petitioner was entitled to regularisation having regard to the provisions of the Karnataka Regularisation of Unauthorised Constructions in Urban Areas Act, 1991 ('act' for short); and that inspite of it BDA was attempting to demolish the structures in his property. On these averments, the petitioner has filed these Petitions on 12. 2. 1993 seeking a direction to BDA to regularise the constructions made in Survey No. 52 described in the Schedule to the Pet




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top