M.F.SALDANHA
SWAMY B. N. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
( 1 ) THESE group of petitions relates to the year 1992 and 1993. In fact, despite the fact that the subject-matter of these petitions is something like eight years old, the earlier orders passed by this Court will indicate that the grievance of the entire set of petitioners who are Law Officers of the B. D. A. was to the effect that they are kept in a state of uncertainty insofar as no regulations had been framed as far as their employment is concerned and that therefore, they were highly prejudiced. The added circumstances to my mind which also requires to be taken into account is the fact that the petitioners are all performing various legal functions and are effectively advocates which is a matter which this Court requires to take special cognizance of. Pursuant to the earlier orders passed, the Government finally approved the regulations and the basic grievance therefore is redressed. At that stage one further difficulty emerged which 1 shall briefly summarize. In the entire group of petitions that are before me, there are in all 23 persons who have been appointed at different points of time. The Government in all has sanctioned 10 posts and therefore as fa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.