SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Kar) 36

PADMANABHIAH
B. D. NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
SHAMSHEER JUNG BAHADUR RANA – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS is a revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order of the learned City magistrate, Bangalore, in Cri. Misc. no. 131 of 1955, holding that the respondent-first party was entitled to remain in possession of the disputed property until evicted therefrom in due course of law.

( 2 ) THE facts that have given rise to this petition are briefly as follows: Proceedings were started by the police under Section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Cri. Mis. No. 131/55 on the file of the learned City Magistrate, Bangalore, tn connection with a dispute between the petitioner-2nd party and the respondent-1st party in relation to a strip of land lying between premises No. 3 belonging to the petitioner and No. 4 belonging to the respondent in Miller Road, civil Station, Bangalore. The learned Magistrate enquired into the matter and held that there was no dispute with respect to the property in question and that there was no likelihood of any breach of the peace and observed that the proceedings should not have been initiated at all- In view of this conclusion arrived at by him, the attachment was withdrawn and the subsequent proceedings were set aside, in addition to thi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top