SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Kar) 72

K.S.HEGDE, C.HONNIAH
NARAYANA KAMATH (S. ) – Appellant
Versus
GANAPATHI KAMATH – Respondent


HEGDE, J.

( 1 ) IN this writ petition, under Art. 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner seeks to get quashed the order passed by respondent 2 in Sl. No. 8 of 1963 on his file by issuing a writ of certiorari.

( 2 ) SERIAL No. 8 of 1963 on the file of respondent 2 was an application made by the petitioner under S. 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking approval of respondent 2 for dismissal of respondent 1 which had been ordered on 25 March, 1963. Respondent 2 refused to accord the approval prayed for. Hence this petition.

( 3 ) THE material facts of the case are these : respondent 1 was a checking inspector serving under the petitioner. He was charged with as many as five items of misconduct and in respect of those charges, an enquiry, was held by the petitioner. At the enquiry, the petitioner came to the conclusion that respondent 1 was guilty of those charges. Therefore, he dismissed respondent 1 from service after complying with the requirements of the law and, thereafter, applied to respondent 2 for approval under S. 33 (2) (b), as there was an industrial dispute pending between the petitioner and its workmen. As mentioned earlier, respondent 2 refused to






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top