SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Kar) 71

A.R.SOMNATH IYER, D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR
K. V. REVANNA – Appellant
Versus
SUSEELAMMA – Respondent


SOMNATH IYER, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by a husband whose application for a decree for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed by the Civil Judge.

( 2 ) THE marriage between the two spouses was admittedly solemnized in March 1955. While according to the husband they lived together as man and wife for a period of two years thereafter, the wife staled in her statement of objections that they lived together for a short time under the same roof During the course of her evidence she stated that they so lived for about a year

( 3 ) ON the allegation that sometime during the year 1958, the wife went to her parents but never returned despite many efforts made by the husband to get her back, he sought a decree for restriction of conjugal rights.

( 4 ) THE defence to that application was manifold. The husband was charged with incapacity for consummation of the marriage. It was nest said that he attempted to commit sodomy on the wife and that he imputed unchastity to her. That he commenced manhandling her and denied her even food and other comforts of life were the other allegations

( 5 ) THE only two witnesses who gave evidence were the two spouses, the husband supporting his case and





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top