SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Kar) 18

D.M.CHANDRASHEKHAR
STATE OF MYSORE – Appellant
Versus
BASWANATH RAO – Respondent


( 1 ) AN important question whether the Court has power to grant what is called 'anticipatory bail' arises for consideration in this revision case.

( 2 ) THE Tahsildar, Bhalki, lodged a complaint on 23-1-1964 with the police at Dhanura that while the Patwari of Malchapur was collecting revenue, the respondents before this Court, abused the Patwari and assaulted him with shoes and thereby obstructed the public servant from discharging his duties. The police registered a case against the respondents under S. 353 I. P. C. and sent the first information report to the Magistrate.

( 3 ) FEARING that they might be arrested by the police, the respondents appeared before the Firs class Magistrate, Bhalki, on 20-3-1964 and made an application praying that they might be released on bail. This application appears to have been opposed by the Prosecutor. The learned magistrate passed an order on the same day as follows:

"accused persons are released on Bail on their executing P and S bonds in the sum of Rs. 500 each. The concerned police be informed. The accused persons should appear before police. Dharwar for investigation as and when they are called. "

( 4 ) AGAINST this order the State filed




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top