SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Kar) 55

MEDAPA, VASUDEVAMURTHY
C. G. DEVARAJU NAIDU – Appellant
Versus
T. M. PRABHUVIAH – Respondent


VASUDEVAMURTHY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition has been referred to a Bench, it involves a question of law of some importance on which there has been no decided case of this Court so far.

( 2 ) ONE Gurtiswami Naidu, father of the petitioner who claims to be his only son and legal representative, filed an application under Order 33, Rule 1, Civil P. C. , seeking permission to sue in forma pauperis, for partition and possession of a half share in some tmmoveable properties. The application was accompanied by an unstamped plaint purporting to be under Order 7 Rule 1, Civil P. C. Notices were ordered on his application but before his pauperism was enquired into, and his application registered as a suit Guruswami Naidu died. The petitioner filed two applications LA. No. 1 under Order 22, B. 4, Civil P. C. , to be brought on record as the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff and allowed to continue the proceedings initiated by his father; and. A. No. 2 under O. 33, rule 1, Civil P. C. praying for permission to sue md continue his father's suit in forma pauperis is he himself was unable to pay the necessary court-fee on the plaint.

( 3 ) THE District Judge of Shimoga dismiss






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top