SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Kar) 31

MEDAPA, VENKATA RAMAIYA
RATILAL BROS. – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF MYSORE – Respondent


YENKATA RAMAIYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS petn. is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of writs of certiorari and prohibition to quash the order passed by reap. 1 and for a direction that the said order should not be executed. The ground on which the writs are sought is that the order passed by resp. 1 for eviction of the petnrs. from the premises of which resp. 2 is the owner is without jurisdiction under the provisions of the Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Order. Respondent 3 is said to be an unregistered association of Jains of the Swatambar cult and purchased the building in about the year 1947 for the purpose of running a residential Hindi school. The petnrs. have been the tenants of the premises from a time long prior to the date of the purchase by resp. 2. An appln. made by resp, 2 to the House Rent Controller for eviction of the petnrs. on the ground that it was needed for opening the school was unsuccessful. A similar appln. 61ed in the following year was allowed by the House Rent Controller dismissed by the Labour Comr. on appeal but eventually granted by the Govt. It is this order of Govt. which is attacked by the petnrs. and with respect to w












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top