CHIDANANDA ULLAL, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
RUKMANI – Appellant
Versus
V. UDAY KUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this appeal the appellants have called in question the order dated 1-4-2006 in FDP No. 10007/ 1994 passed by the Addl. City Civil Judge, mayohall, Bangalore City.
( 2 ) THE subject-matter of the litigation is property bearing No. 155/b situated in the compound of premises No. 1 Wheeler Road, civil Station, Bangalore measuring in all 5600 sq. ft. (for short 'the schedule property' ). The appellants and respondents are relatives except respondent No. 23. The family tree is as under :
( 3 ) THE appellants in this appeal are the children of defendant No. 5 and respondents are the plaintiffs and other defendants before the trial Court and respondent No. 23 is the auction purchaser. In this judgment the parties are referred to their status before the trial court.
( 4 ) PLAINTIFFS filed O. S. No. 245/1980 later numbered as O. S. No. 8471/1980
against the defendants for partition and separate possession of their 3/8th share in the schedule property. The trial Court decreed O. S. No. 8471/ 80 vide judgment dated 31-7-1993 declaring that the plaintiffs together are entitled for 3/7th share in the entire schedule property. The defendants being aggrieved by t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.