SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 549

CHIDANANDA ULLAL, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
RUKMANI – Appellant
Versus
V. UDAY KUMAR – Respondent


H. N. NAGAMOHAN DAS, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal the appellants have called in question the order dated 1-4-2006 in FDP No. 10007/ 1994 passed by the Addl. City Civil Judge, mayohall, Bangalore City.

( 2 ) THE subject-matter of the litigation is property bearing No. 155/b situated in the compound of premises No. 1 Wheeler Road, civil Station, Bangalore measuring in all 5600 sq. ft. (for short 'the schedule property' ). The appellants and respondents are relatives except respondent No. 23. The family tree is as under :

( 3 ) THE appellants in this appeal are the children of defendant No. 5 and respondents are the plaintiffs and other defendants before the trial Court and respondent No. 23 is the auction purchaser. In this judgment the parties are referred to their status before the trial court.

( 4 ) PLAINTIFFS filed O. S. No. 245/1980 later numbered as O. S. No. 8471/1980

against the defendants for partition and separate possession of their 3/8th share in the schedule property. The trial Court decreed O. S. No. 8471/ 80 vide judgment dated 31-7-1993 declaring that the plaintiffs together are entitled for 3/7th share in the entire schedule property. The defendants being aggrieved by t




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top