A.C.KABIN
ANITHA VAZ – Appellant
Versus
M. RANGAPPA – Respondent
( 1 ) BY judgment dated 27. 11. 1999 passed by the learned XI addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore in O. S. No. 92/1994, the appellant's (the plaintiff's) suit for specific performance of the contract has been partly decreed directing the respondent No. 1 (the defendant No. 1)to execute the deed for the sale of joint share of the defendant No. 1 in the suit property. Praying for a decree for grant of relief for the sale of the whole of the property as per agreement, the plaintiff has preferred this appeal.
( 2 ) THE suit property (i. e. schedule 'a') is H. No. 39/9, Marappa line, Bazar Street, Neelasandra, Bangalore consisting of land and building thereon totally measuring east to west 40 feet, north to south 153/4 feet. Admittedly, the plaintiff was residing in the said premises as the tenant paying rent to the defendant No. 1's elder brother M. Rangaiah; and later to the defendant No. 1, after Rangaiah's death. It is the claim of the plaintiff that the defendant No. 1 offered to sell the said property, i. e. , the property described in Schedule "a" to her for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) to discharge certain debts and after receiving an advance of Rs. 70,00
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.