SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 33

D.V.SHYLENDRA KUMAR
C. C. VENKATANARASIMHAIAH S/O. CHIKKAVENKATARAYAPPA – Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (ENTERTAINMENT TAX) AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


D. V. SHYLENDRA KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two writ petitions are filed by a person who provides entertainment to his customers through what is known as cable connection to television through which is viewed the programs or who provides dish antenna facilities through which such entertainment can be received and viewed through the television sets which the customers have installed in their residences.

( 2 ) PETITIONER is aggrieved by the demand notices in the two writ petitions while in W. P. No. 15521/2006 the demand dated 18. 12. 2001, vide Annexure-A, purporting to be under Section 4c of the Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, is for a sum of Rs. 29,250/- for the period November 01 to November 02 and in W. P. No. 15522/2006 the demand dated 20. 11. 2001 vide Annexure-A, purporting to be under Section 4c of the Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, is for a sum of Rs. 14,250/- for the period of April 01 to October'01. Under these two notices, the petitioner had been called upon to pay this amount, failing which it was intimated that proceedings will be initiated before the Court of Judicial Magistrate I Class, Chikkaballapur, for realization of the amount etc.

( 3 ) VERSION of






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top