SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 230

MANJULA CHELLUR
MUNIYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE contentions of the parties in nutshell are as under : the writ petitioner claims to be the legal representative of original owner Mr. Munivenkatappa (her father-in-law ). The present writ petition is filed by her, being aggrieved by the notification dated 22-3-2005 at Annexure-K made by the 1st respondent- state in No. Na. Aa. Ee. 30 Bim. Bhu. Swa. 2004. Father-in-law of the present petitioner was the owner of land bearing Sy. Nos. 50, 51 and 52 totally measuring 21 acres and 39 guntas situate at Tavarakere village of Begur Hobl. In this writ petition only survey number 50 measuring 6 acres 20 guntas is the subject-matter (hereinafter referred to as 'the land' ). Petitioner is the wife of one of the sons of munivenkatappa by name Bheemananna alias subbanna who died on 24-1-2005. The State Government in exercise of its eminent d omain power proceeded to acquire the land in question along with other lands for a public purpose,. e. formation of byrasandra Tavarakere Madivalu layout (B. T. M. ). Accordingly, 4 (1) notification under Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called for short 'the Act'), came to be issued in No. BDA/salao/4. PR (S)/31/1977-78, dated 19-9-1977 and final


























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top