CHIDANANDA ULLAL, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
V. GK. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ENGG (PVT) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
H. N. NARAYANA REDDY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 19. 4. 2007 in O. S. No. 2927/2005 passed by the XII Add1. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for ejectment, recovery of arrears of rent, damages and directing an enquiry into future mesne profits.
( 2 ) APPELLANT is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiffbefore the Trial Court. In this judgment the parties are referred to their status before the Trial Court.
( 3 ) PLAINTIFF is the owner of the schedule property. Defendant is the tenant in the schedule property under the plaintiff on a monthly. rent of Rs. 13,500/ -. Defendant committed default in payment of monthly rents. Plaintiff got issued a lawyer's notice or legal notice dated 19. 3. 2005 terminating the tenancy of defendant, but the defendant failed to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the schedule property to the plaintiff. Having no other alternative the plaintiff had filed O. S. No. 2927/2005 against the defendant for ejectment, recovery of rent, damages and for future mesne profits.
( 4 ) THE defendants entered appearance before the Trial Court and filed written statement i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.