SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 767

CHIDANANDA ULLAL, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
V. GK. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT ENGG (PVT) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
H. N. NARAYANA REDDY – Respondent


NAGAMOHAN DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 19. 4. 2007 in O. S. No. 2927/2005 passed by the XII Add1. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for ejectment, recovery of arrears of rent, damages and directing an enquiry into future mesne profits.

( 2 ) APPELLANT is the defendant and respondent is the plaintiffbefore the Trial Court. In this judgment the parties are referred to their status before the Trial Court.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFF is the owner of the schedule property. Defendant is the tenant in the schedule property under the plaintiff on a monthly. rent of Rs. 13,500/ -. Defendant committed default in payment of monthly rents. Plaintiff got issued a lawyer's notice or legal notice dated 19. 3. 2005 terminating the tenancy of defendant, but the defendant failed to vacate and deliver the vacant possession of the schedule property to the plaintiff. Having no other alternative the plaintiff had filed O. S. No. 2927/2005 against the defendant for ejectment, recovery of rent, damages and for future mesne profits.

( 4 ) THE defendants entered appearance before the Trial Court and filed written statement i

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top