SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 636

CHIDANANDA ULLAL, H.N.NAGAMOHAN DAS
K. GAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
CHIKKATHIMMA – Respondent


NAGAMOHAN DAS, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10. 03. 2005 in O. S. No. 5100/1998 passed by the 11th Additional city Civil Judge, Bangalore city, partly decreeing the suit of plaintiff for refund of advance money and rejecting the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale.

( 2 ) APPELLANT is the plaintiff and respondents are the defendants before the trial Court. In this judgment the parties are referred to by their status before the trial Court.

( 3 ) DEFENDANTS are owners of 16 guntas of land in survey No. 5/ 1 of Singasandra village, Begur hobli, Bangalore south taluk, hereinafter referred to as the schedule property. Defendants entered into an agreement of sale with the plaintiff on 29. 06. 1995 agreeing to sell the schedule property at the rate of Rs. 120/- per square feet subject to the availability of actual measurement of the schedule property. Under the agreement of sale plaintiff has paid an advance amount of Rs. 3. 00 lakhs to the defendants. Despite repeated requests, demands and notices, the defendants refused to execute a registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff by accepting the balance of sale consideration.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top