SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Kar) 582

V.GOPALA GOWDA, C.R.KUMARASWAMY
BALU RAMA PUJARI – Appellant
Versus
GURULINGAPPA MALLAPPA BAILWAD – Respondent


GOPALA GOWDA, J, J.


( 1 ) SETTLEMENT not reported, Learned counsel for the first respondent has offered three cheques for a total amount of rs. 1,00,000. 00 but petitioner is not present to accept the same.

( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties both on the application for condonation of delay and on merits.

( 3 ) THIS review petition was filed on 19-11-2005 seeking to set aside the order dt: 18-7-1994 passed in W. A. No. 969/1991. Since there is a delay of 4109 days (more than 11 years), I. A. I/2006 is filed to condone the said delay. Regarding delay, the petitioner has stated in the application as under:

"2. It is submitted that this Hon'ble Court allowed the Writ Petition on the ground that the petitioner is not produced the receipt of payment made in respect of the occupancy price on 24-7-1967 which is paid by the father of the husband of the petitioner. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner is producing the attested copies of the receipt dated 24-7-67 attested by the Gazetted Sub-Treasury Officer, Treasury/khanapur as a document-A, and the petitioner also produced the attested copy of the receipt dated 24-7-1967 which is attested by the branch manager, Sta







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top