V.GOPALA GOWDA, C.R.KUMARASWAMY
BALU RAMA PUJARI – Appellant
Versus
GURULINGAPPA MALLAPPA BAILWAD – Respondent
( 1 ) SETTLEMENT not reported, Learned counsel for the first respondent has offered three cheques for a total amount of rs. 1,00,000. 00 but petitioner is not present to accept the same.
( 2 ) WE have heard the learned counsel for the parties both on the application for condonation of delay and on merits.
( 3 ) THIS review petition was filed on 19-11-2005 seeking to set aside the order dt: 18-7-1994 passed in W. A. No. 969/1991. Since there is a delay of 4109 days (more than 11 years), I. A. I/2006 is filed to condone the said delay. Regarding delay, the petitioner has stated in the application as under:
"2. It is submitted that this Hon'ble Court allowed the Writ Petition on the ground that the petitioner is not produced the receipt of payment made in respect of the occupancy price on 24-7-1967 which is paid by the father of the husband of the petitioner. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner is producing the attested copies of the receipt dated 24-7-67 attested by the Gazetted Sub-Treasury Officer, Treasury/khanapur as a document-A, and the petitioner also produced the attested copy of the receipt dated 24-7-1967 which is attested by the branch manager, Sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.