SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 469

B.S.PATIL
REEBOK INDIA COMPANY (A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT) – Appellant
Versus
GOMZI ACTIVE ALSO STYLING ITSELF AS GOMZEE ACTIVE, PROPRIETARY CONCERNED OWNED – Respondent


B. S. PATIL, J.

( 1 ) THE controversy involved in this appeal pertains to the use of the trade slogan "i AM WHAT I am". The Appellants herein are aggrieved by the grant of temporary injunction restraining them from using the Logo "i AM WHAT I AM" along with their trade mark.

( 2 ) THE Appellants herein are defendants in the suit, O. S. No. 16861/2005 filed by the respondent/plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against them restraining them from using on their products the logo/trade slogan "i AM WHAT I AM" and for payment of damages in a sum of Rs. 15,000/-and for rendition of accounts.

( 3 ) IT is the case of the plaintiff that the trade slogan "i AM WHAT I AM" is its distinctive style and design atleast since 1998, used on its Garments which is alleged to have been stolen/pirated by the defendants, thus infringing their proprietary rights including intellectual property. The plaintiff further asserted that they were the first to use the logo "i AM WHAT I AM" and therefore the plaintiff alone can claim rights over the said slogan as a Trade Mark.

( 4 ) THE defendants contended that:

(1) As per Section 2 (1) (w) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the expression, "registered Trade
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top