SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 385

B.PADMARAJ, S.ABDUL NAZEER
REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ETC – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASH JADAV ETC – Respondent


B. PADMARAJ, J.

( 1 ) THE sole accused Prakash Jadav faced a trial before the Trial court for the offences punishable under sections 302, 392 and 201 of IPC for having committed the murder of a child by name akhila, with the intention of robbing the ornaments, such as, gold ear rings and silver leg chains, which were worn by the said child and committed robbery by snatching the gold ear rings and silver leg chains, which were worn by the child and that further, after committing the robbery and murder kept the dead body of the child Akhila in a plastic bag, carried it in a suit case, thereafter, by selling away the gold ear rings and silver leg chains at Davanagere, having purchased a gunny bag, put the plastic bag containing the dead body of the child into the gunny bag and with an intention of causing disappearance of the evidence, kept the said gunny bag containing the dead body of the child in a railway compartment at davanagere Railway Station in the Inter-city train and has tried to cause the disappearance of the evidence of murder and robbery, so as to screen himself from legal punishment and thereby, committed the above said offences. At the conclusion of the trial, the tri
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top