SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Kar) 275

K.SREEDHAR RAO
UPPINANGADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Appellant
Versus
P. NARAYANA PRABHU – Respondent


K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the appeals pertain to the same parties, on same set of facts, giving rise to similar liabilities but for distinct and different periods.

( 2 ) THE Uppinangady Grama Panchayath conducted public auction of the stalls. The respondent-accused is the successful bidder of stall No. 2. The terms of auction are as follows:

(1) the successful bidder will be allotted the stall for a period of three years on leave and licence basis.

(2) The entire bid amount shall constitute the total rent for the total period of three years.

(3) One third of the bid amount shall be payable by cash immediately after the acceptance of bid. The balance of the bid amount representing two years rent could be payable by way of post dated cheques. The contract for occupation of the shop commenced from 1-7-1997. It is on record that even before completion of one year period, the respondent unilaterally terminated the contract, delivered the keys of the shop to the panchayath. The cheques issued by the accused towards future rental liability is presented for encashment. The cheques are dishonoured. In respect of said cheques a private complaint is filed against the accused.

( 3 ) THE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top