SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 769

N.KUMAR
DR. M. SUMITHRA – Appellant
Versus
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY JNANA BHARATHI – Respondent


N. KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is working as senior grade lecturer at Kannada Adhyayana Kendra, Centre for kannada Studies, Jnana Bharathi, Bangalore University. She made a complaint against Professor siddalingaiah, Director, Centre for Kannada Studies, to the Hon'ble Minister for Higher education and to the Sub-Inspector, Jnanabharathi Police Station, regarding the alleged sexual harassment, A University Committee for Combating Violence and Sexual Harassment for women at Work Place, held an enquiry on the complaint of the petitioner and after such enquiry it exonerated Professor Siddalingaiah. In other words, it held the allegations in the complaint were not substantiated. In the report it also recorded a finding that the petitioner, Professor siddalingaiah and Ph. D. student C. M. Rajanna have misconducted themselves in the course of their employment. The material produced before Court shows that Item No. 3 of the agenda in the extraordinary meeting held by the Syndicate on 29. 3. 2005, the Vice Chancellor briefed the syndicate about the report submitted by the Committee. After detailed discussion they took a decision to accept the report of the Committee. The said report con










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top