SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 721

H.G.RAMESH
BHAGYAMMA – Appellant
Versus
T. L. BASAVARAJU – Respondent


HULUVADI G. RAMESH, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal is by the plaintiffs being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.), Arsikere in RA 22/1997 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the Munsiff, Arsikere in OS 213/1989 and dismissing the appeal filed by the plaintiffs.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, one propositus Mallappashetty had two children by name Kotappa and Mallamma. Kotappa had a son by name Papanna who died issueless and a daughter by name gurusiddamma who had a son by name Honnappa. Mallappashetty bequeathed the property in favour of Gurusiddamma. The said Gurusiddamma pre-deceased Honappa who also died issueless. This Mallappashetty's daughter Mallamma. e. , Gurusiddamma's paternal aunt had two sons by name Veerabhadrappa and Parmeshappa. Veerabhadrappa and Parmeshappa are the plaintiffs claiming the suit property inherited by Honappa son of Gurusiddamma in whose favour the property was bequeathed by Mallappashetty.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiffs, the defendants. e. the 1st defendant is said to have entered into an agreement of sale with Honappa in respect of the suit property which measures 3. 33 acres and the said Honappa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top