SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 720

K.SREEDHAR RAO
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KELUDAPPA – Respondent


SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) NOTICE to R1 (c) in m. F. A. No. 992 of 2003 by way of paper publication is accepted. Both the cases arise out of the same accident.

( 2 ) THE writ petition is filed against the order passed by this court in C. R. P. No. 545 of 2003, which came to be dismissed on the ground that the revision is not maintainable. Hence, the writ is filed challenging the judgment and award in M. V. C. No. 1431 of 1997. M. F. A. No. 992 of 2003 pertains to M. V. C. No. 1417 of 1997.

( 3 ) THE petitioners are the inmates of the jeep bearing registration No. MH 10-C 0846, which met with the accident. The tribunal awarded compensation to the petitioners and directed the owner and insurer to pay the compensation. The insurer is in appeal seeking avoidance of liability on the ground that there is violation of permit conditions. Tempo-Trax is a private service vehicle. The evidence adduced discloses that the petitioner in M. V. C. No. 1417 of 1997 was travelling as fare paid passenger.

( 4 ) IN view of the violation of permit conditions it is argued that the insurer is not liable. The policy of insurance is a comprehensive policy, which covers the risk of inmates of the vehicle ma



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top