SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Kar) 343

K.SREEDHAR RAO
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HUSSAIN SAB – Respondent


K. SREEDHAR RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in m. V. C. No. 139 of 1995 are the L. Rs. of deceased Babanbi and the petitioners in m. V. C. No. 142 of 1995 are the L. Rs. of the deceased Khasimbee who died in motor vehicle accident. The deceased were travelling in a lorry bearing No. CNR 3303. The occurrence of accident and negligence of the driver is not in dispute. The liability of the insurer is in dispute. Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at Rs. 750 per month, applying multiplier of 17 awarded a compensation of Rs. 1,33,900 in M. V. C. No. 139 of 1995 and in M. V. C. No. 142 of 1995 compensation of Rs. 98,000 is awarded with interest at 6 per cent per annum from the date of petition till payment. Claims Tribunal directed that the compensation to be payable by the owner and the insurer of the lorry.

( 2 ) THE insurer has filed the appeals and the claimants have filed cross-objections seeking enhancement of the compensation. The petitioners contend that the deceased were getting back from place of work to home and on their way they were hit by the lorry in question. Therefore, contend that the owner and insurer are liable towards third party liability.

( 3 ) THE owner





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top