R.V.RAVEENDRAN, H.BILLAPPA
B. PRAKASH CHAND – Appellant
Versus
S. V. GYANCHAND JAIN – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner is the tenant and the respondent is the landlord in regard to a shop premises measuring more than 14sq. m. situated at Sakleshpur (Premises for short ). The landlord filed HRC No. 3/1995 in the Court of the Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.), Sakleshpur for eviction of the tenant under Section 21 (1) Provisos (a) (h) and (i) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act 1961 (Old Act for short ). After evidence, the said petition was allowed under Section 21 (1) Proviso (h) of the Old Act by order dated 18. 8. 2000 and the tenant was directed to deliver vacant possession of the suit premises to the landlord within one month.
( 2 ) FEELING aggrieved, the tenant (petitioner herein) filed a Revision Petition under Section 50 (2) of the Old Act before the District Judge, Hassan on 31-8-2000 registered as HRC. R. P. No. 19/2000.
( 3 ) DURING the pendency of the said revision proceedings, the Old Act was replaced by the Karnataka Rent Act 1999 (New Act for short ). Sections 1, 3 and 6 of the New Act came into force on 5. 12. 2001 and the remaining provisions of the New Act came into force on 31. 12. 2001. The provisions of the New Act were inapplicable to the premises havin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.