SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Kar) 364

N.KUMAR
B. BENNARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Respondent


N. KUMAR, J.

( 1 ) IN W. P. No. 24204/2000 an application is filed by the impleading applicants who are the purchasers of the land in question. As they are the persons who are likely to be affected by any orders passed by this Court in the Writ Petition and in fact their sale deed is sought to be quashed,. A. I/04 is allowed. Petitioner to amend the cause title.

( 2 ) THE brief facts giving raise to the Writ Petitions are as hereunder :3. The subject matter of dispute is land bearing Sy. No. 108/3 situated at Mysore Village, mysore Taluk, measuring 3 acres 10 guntas. In respect of this land two applications were filed in form No. VII for grant of occupancy rights under Section 48a of the Karnataka Land Reforms act (hereinafter for short, called as 'the Act' ). One application was filed by one Perumal and the said case was numbered as LRF No. 2977/74-75. Yet another application is filed by K. M. Jayaram Mudaliar. Both the applications were clubbed. Perumal did not press his application and, therefore, his application came to be rejected. Whereas, Jayaram Mudaliar's claim was accepted by the Tribunal and occupancy rights were granted in his favour by an order dated 7. 11. 1978. In

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top