M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO, S.MOHAN
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
N. GUNDAPPA – Respondent
( 1 ) WE have not the slightest hesitation in holding that the proceedings under Section 9 of the karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 are quasi judicial in nature. Our reasons are as under: firstly there is a complaint. Secondly there is a preliminary enquiry to conduct investigation. Thirdly a copy of the complaint is forwarded to the public servant and the Competent Authority concerned. Fourthly the public servant is afforded an opportunity to offer his comments on such complaint. Thereafter should the Lokayukta submit a report as to what consequences follow are delineated under Section 13 of the Act. Having regard to the serious consequences contemplated thereunder, the conclusion is inescapable that it is quasi judicial in nature. Not only that, Section 14 of the Act also contemplates initiation of prosecution.
( 2 ) ACCORDINGLY, we agree with the learned single Judge and dismiss this Writ Appeal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.