S.RAJENDRA BABU, M.RAMA JOIS
N. KRISHAN (DECD. BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, K. BADRINARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
SETTLEMENT COMMISSION – Respondent
( 1 ) IN these four petitions presented by the same person praying for quashing the order passed by the Settlement Commission (Income-tax and Wealth-tax) constituted under the provisions of the income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short), the following two questions of law arise for consideration :
" (1) Whether a person who approaches the Income-tax Settlement Commission constituted under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, seeking a full and final settlement of his case is entitled to question the legality of its decision in a petition under article 226 of the constitution of India ?
(2) If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, what is the scope for interference under article 226 of the Constitution of India against a decision of the Settlement Commission ?"
( 2 ) THE facts of the case, in brief, are as follows : The petitioner was a regular assessee being assessed to income-tax the provision of the Act. He was the managing director of Internation instruments Limited, a public limited company, established under the technical collaboration with a German-based company VDO Tachometer Werke Gmbh ("vdo" for short ). The petitioner was intereste
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.