SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 345

P.P.BOPANNA
SRIKANTA DATTA NARASIMHARAJA WADIYAR – Appellant
Versus
VENKATESWARA REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES (PVT. ) LTD. – Respondent


BOPANNA, J.

( 1 ) A Preliminary objection is raised by the contesting respondents on the maintainability of the company petition under sections 397, 398 and 402 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short, "the act), on the ground that the petitioner is not a member of the first respondent-company and that therefore, he cannot invoked the aforesaid provisions of the Act. A similar objection was raised in Company Petition No. 8 of 1982 by the contesting respondent in that petition and that was the subject-matter of Original Side Appeal No. 2 of 1985 before a Devision Bench of this court in shri Balaji Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashok Kavle [1989] 66 Comp Cas 654 to which was a party. The Division Bench had ruled that if a person was admittedly treated as a member of the company and satisfied the company court that he is a shareholder of a company by virtue of allotment of shares in his favour which is evidence not only in the register of other document maintained and filed by the company, it is not open to the company to contend that for the purpose of section 397 and 398 of the Act, a shareholder must comply with the condition precedent stipulated in section 41 (2) of the Act.

( 2 ) IT


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top