SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 547

RAMAKRISHNA
SIDDALINGIAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


RAMAKRISHNA, J.

( 1 ) EVEN though these cases are posted for orders, by consent of both parties, they are heard on merits and disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE petitioners in these two petitions have sought for a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order of the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya made on 3-3-1987 at Annexure-D. The matter arises in this way: Boratah - 2nd respondent herein in these two petitions, a person representing Scheduled Caste. presented an application before the Assistant Commissioner, mandya Sub-Division, Mandya, under the provisions of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands), Act 1978, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') seeking relief under the said Act. His case was that 2 acres of land in Sy. No. 283 situate in the Village Yathagadahalli, Guttalu Hobli, Mandya Taluk, Mandya District, came to be granted in his favour under the Darkast Rules (The Mysore Land Grant Rules framed under the mysore Land Revenue Code), by the Competent Authority by an order made on 31-9-1944. It may be pointed out, that the proceedings were actually initiated in this behalf in proceedings No. 9/41-42 and a saguvali chit














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top