SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 315

PREM CHAND JAIN, SHIVASHANKAR BHAT
BALASAHEB VENKATESH KHASBAG @ KULKARNI – Appellant
Versus
LAND TRIBUNAL – Respondent


SHIVASHANKAR BHAT, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER in W. P. No. 4474/1978 is the appellant in W. A. No. 2707/1985 - (he is referred as the petitioner hereinafter ). Petitioner unsuccessfully challenged the order of the Land Tribunal conferring occupancy rights in favour of respondents 3 to 5 under the provisions of the karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (the Act' for short) and hence this appeal.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT-5 was held to be the tenant of Sy. No. 16 (1 acre 9 guntas) and respondents 3 and 4 were held to be tenants of Sy. No. 48 (5 acres 10 guntas) of Khasbhag village, Belgaum Taluk by the Land Tribunal and consequently, they were ordered to be registered as occupants under section 48-A of the Act. The order was challenged mainly on the ground that the area comprising the lands in question came within the purview of the Urban Land (Ceiling and regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ceiling Act', for short); therefore, the Act ceased to be applicable.

( 3 ) THE Land Tribunal and the learned Single Judge, proceeded on the assumption that the lands in question are within the Belgaum Urban Agglomeration, as defined in the Ceiling Act and that, the lands are comprised in the are































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top