SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(Kar) 409

BOPANNA
B. VENKATASWAMY REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


BOPANNA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two petitions are disposed of by a common order since common questions of law arise for consideration in both these petitions.

( 2 ) IN Writ Petition No. 11976 of 1984 the preliminary notification in respect of the land in question was made on 21-3-1977 and the final notification was made on 14-5-1980. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition in the year 1984. In Writ Petition No. 17534 of 1087 the preliminary notification was made on 9-5-1968 and the final notification was made on 28-10-1971. Notices under Sections 9 and 10 of the Land Acquisition Act were served on the petitioners on 7-12-1978, The award was passed on 4-6-1981. Award notices were served on the petitioners on 17-11-1981. The petitioners have filed their claim petition claiming compensation as per Annexures B and C on 17-11-1978. All the same in both the petitions the petitioners have challenged the Impugned acquisition proceedings on the basis of certain resolutions passed by the Bangalore Development Authority (B. D. A. for short) in their favour. In the first Writ petition, a resolution was passed by the B. D. A. on 17-11-1982 in Subject No. 241 acceding to the request of the petitio




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top