SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Kar) 7

KULKARNI
M. NARAYANAPPA – Appellant
Versus
HEMAVATHI – Respondent


KULKARNI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision by the plaintiff against the order dated 30-3-1984 passed by the Munsiff, gowribidanur, in O. S. 135 of 1983, allowing. A. 6.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendants alleging that he has been in lawful possession of the property and that the defendants have been interfering with his possession. He filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

( 3 ) THE defendants resisted that application.

( 4 ) THE Court below after hearing the parties, granted temporary injunction pending suit.

( 5 ) THE defendants, thereafter, filed an application under Order 47 Rule 1 of C. P. C. for reviewing the said order granting temporary injunction and for framing a tenancy issue and referring the same to the Tribunal under Section 133 of the Land Reforms Act.

( 6 ) THE said application was resisted by the plaintiff.

( 7 ) THE Court below, after hearing the parties, reviewed the order granting ad-interim temporary injunction, allowed. A. 6 and framed an issue as to whether the plaintiff was a tenant of the suit land or not, and referred the same to the Tribunal. The plaintiff, being

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top