SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 438

NARAYANA RAI KUDOOR
NAGANAGOUDA – Appellant
Versus
KAMALAXI – Respondent


NARAYANA RAI KUDOOR, J.

( 1 ) THE matter arises in this way. The respondent Kumari Kamalaxi (Complainant) filed a complaint under Section 200 of Criminal Procedure Code ('the Code') before the Principal munsiff and I Additional JMFC. , Ranebennur against the petitioners (accused) for various offences under the Indian Penal Code including offences under Section 307 and 392 of Indian penal Code. The Magistrate, after recording the sworn statement of the Complainant directed issue of process against the accused for several offences including the offences under Sections 207 and 395 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code as per his order dated 14-8-1985.

( 2 ) IT is the correctness of this order that is sought to be assailed in this Revision Petition. Heard the learned Advocates H. F. M, Reddy and Deshpande for the petitioners and Sri W. V. Arabatti for the respondent.

( 3 ) THE main argument on behalf of the accused was addressed by Sri Deshpande. Sri H. F. M. Reddy put emphasis on the submissions made by Sri Deshpande. Sri Dashpande, in the course of his argument raised three main contentions. Firstly, he contended that in view of the fact the complainant has alleged certain of


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top