SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Kar) 415

Karnataka High Court
Judges : S.R.Rajasekhara Murthy
KHODAY INDUSTRIES LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. - Respondent
Writ Petition 5960 Of 1981
Decided On : 10/30/1985
Advocates Appeared :
K.SHIVASHANKAR BHAT, S.S.NAGANAND

The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of interpreting the Central Excise Tariff, considering trade notices, legislative amendments, and the intention of the amendment to ensure uniformity in the classification of goods for excise duty purposes.

Headnote:

Central Excise - Carbon Paper - Central Excise Act, Section 17(2), 17(3), 17(4) - The court discussed the interpretation of the Central Excise Tariff, specifically the classification of carbon paper under different tariff items. The court considered the trade notices, legislative amendments, and the intention of the amendment to determine the correct classification of carbon paper for excise duty purposes.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a company engaged in the manufacture of carbon paper, challenged the demand for the payment of excise duty under a different tariff item. The Assistant Collector and the Appellate Collector upheld the demand, classifying carbon paper as coated paper under tariff item 17(2). The petitioner contended that carbon paper should be classified as an article of stationery under item 68, as per the trade notice issued by the Collector.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the carbon paper was rightly subjected to levy under item 68 as per the trade advice issued by the Board, and there was no reason to review the levy. The court quashed the order of the Assistant Collector and the Appellate Collector, setting aside the demand for excise duty.

Issues: The issues revolved around the correct classification of carbon paper for excise duty, considering the trade notices, legislative amendments, and the intention of the amendment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the trade notices, legislative amendments, and the intention of the amendment to determine the correct classification of carbon paper for excise duty purposes. It emphasized the need for uniform interpretation of the Central Excise Tariff throughout the country.

Final Decision: The writ petitions were allowed, and the order of the Assistant Collector, the Appellate Collector, and the demand for excise duty were set aside. The petitioner was granted the liberty to claim a refund from the department.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act and is engaged, inter alia, in the manufacture of carbon paper. In the writ petitions, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order of the Assistant Collector Annexure 'd' and that of the Appellate Collector Annexure 'g' and the notice of demand, Annexure 'h'. The two writ petitions relate to the demand made to pay difference of excise duty for the period 16-10-1978 to 18-4-1979 and the demand made for the further period 16-4-1979 to 22-2-1980 as per Annexure 'h'.

( 2 ) A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner Company on 16-4-1979 proposing to demand difference of duty on the carbon paper cleared during 16-10-1978 to 15-4-1979. This item had been subjected to duty under item 68 as per the classification list approved by the proper Officer. What was proposed to be done under the show cause notice was to demand difference of duty payable under item 17 (2) of the Central Excise Tariff which was amended with effect from 27-5-1976.

( 3 ) THE petitioner replied to the show cause notice contending that the carbon paper manufactured by the petitioner Company was being rightly subjected to duty under Item 68 and that was in conformity with the Collector's trade notice 56/76 dated 2-3-1976. The trade notice is reproduced below : "central EXCISE TRADE NOTICE NO. 56/76, DATED 2-3-1976 (3/76 Paper) sub : Paper - carbon paper and stencil paper - Whether excisable under item No. 17 of CET. A doubt has been raised whether carbon paper/stencil paper, produced by conversion of duty paid base paper, should be treated paper falling under Tariff Item 17 (4) of Central Excise Tariff, or as an item of stationery, outside the scope of Item 17 of Central Excise Tariff. 2. The matter has been examined and it is clarified for the information of the trade, that the carbon paper/stencil paper, are articles of stationery, and therefore, outside the purview of Item 17 of Central Excise Tariff. " it was clarified in the said trade notice by the Collector that carbon paper/stencil paper are articles of stationery and, therefore, are outside the purview of Item 17 of the Central Excise Act. It is relevant to notice that this trade notice was issued consequent to the tariff advice 5/76 by the central Board of Central Excise. 'tariff Advice No. 5/76. Subject : Paper - Carbon paper and Stencil Paper - whether Excisable under Item No. 17 of C. E. Tariff. A doubt had been raised whether carbon paper/stencil paper produced by conversion of duty paid base paper, should be treated as paper falling under tariff item 17 (4) of Central Excise Tariff or as an item of stationery, outside the scope of Item 17 of Central Excise Tariff. 2. The matter was considered in the Central Excise Tariff Conference held at Cochin on the 13th to 15th November, 1975. It was reported that carbon paper/stencil paper is sold in the market mostly cut to size by retail stationers. The Indian Customs Tariff Guide has also treated Carbon paper as an item of stationery and not as paper. The Conference was therefore, of the view that carbon paper/stencil paper, were commercially recognised only as articles of stationery. 3. The Board is accordingly advised that carbon paper and stencil paper should be treated as articles of stationery, and therefore outside the purview of item 17 of Central Excise Tariff. '

( 4 ) THE Assistant Collector, in his original order, did not agree with the contention of the petitioner and treated the carbon paper as falling under tariff item 17 (2), which read thus, during the relevant period : item No. Description of goods Rate of duty (1) (2) (3) 17. Paper and paper boards, all sorts (including pasteboard, millboard, strawboard, cardboard and corrugated board), in or in relation to the manufacuture of which any process is ordinarily carried on with the aid of power (1) Uncoated and coated Twenty-five per cent promting and writing paper ad valorem other than poster paper) (2) Paper boar
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top