SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Kar) 30

Karnataka High Court
Judges : Jagannatha Shetty,S.R.Rajasekhara Murthy
STATE OF KARNATAKA - Appellant
Versus
GWALIOR RAYONS SILK MFG.(WVG.) CO.LTD. - Respondent
S. T. R. P. 118 Of 1979
Decided On : 02/03/1984
Advocates Appeared :
S.P.BHAT, S.RAJENDRA BABU

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of 'turnover' and 'purchase price' under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act in relation to the inclusion of transportation charges, supported by a relevant observation from a Supreme Court case.

Headnote:

Transportation Charges - Purchase of Firewood - Karnataka Sales Tax Act, Section 2(1)(v), Section 6 - The court discussed the interpretation of 'turnover' under section 2(1)(v) and 'purchase price' under section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act in relation to the transportation charges paid by the petitioner for the purchase of firewood. The court considered the inclusion of transportation charges in the turnover and purchase price, and referred to the definition of 'turnover' and the absence of a specific definition for 'purchase price' under the Act. The court also cited a relevant observation from a Supreme Court case to support its interpretation of the inclusion of freight charges in the purchase price. The court ultimately allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the Tribunal, restoring the order of assessment.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner-company claimed a deduction for transportation charges paid to the sellers of firewood for the assessment year 1973-74. The assessing officer included the transportation charges in the taxable turnover, leading to appeals and ultimately a revision petition filed by the State.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the transportation charges were considered as part of the purchase price and turnover, based on the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act and a supporting observation from a Supreme Court case.

Issues: The main issue revolved around the inclusion of transportation charges in the turnover and purchase price under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Act and the application of a supporting observation from a Supreme Court case to determine the inclusion of transportation charges in the purchase price and turnover.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition, set aside the order of the Tribunal, and restored the order of assessment.

RAJASEKHARA MURTHY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision arises out of the order of the Tribunal dated 22nd November, 1978, passed in s. T. A. No. 821 of 1976.

( 2 ) THE petitioner-company manufactures synthetic fibres. For the purpose of such manufacture, the company purchases firewood in large quantities from several suppliers in South Kanara district and elsewhere. The company has a purchase depot at Mangalore and other places. For the assessment year 1973-74, the petitioner claimed a deduction in a sum of Rs. 1,25,808. 08 from the total turnover, as transportation charges paid to the sellers of firewood. The Commercial Tax Officer, Mangalore, treated this item as part of the price of the firewood and included it in the taxable turnover. In the appeal preferred against the assessment, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Mangalore, upheld the assessment and dismissed the appeal. In further appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal deleted the turnover in dispute and directed the assessing officer to modify the assessment. Being aggrieved by the said order, the State has filed this revision petition.

( 3 ) THE assessee purchased firewood from the five suppliers and paid different amounts to the sellers towards transportation charges. The assessing officer, on a scrutiny of the bills and documents produced by the assessee, held that the assessee was not entitled to deduction of the said sums from the turnover, since the transportation charges paid by the assessee were part of the price paid for the firewood supplied. The contention of the assessee before the assessing officer was that the transportation charges were separately charged by the sellers and therefore, the same do not form part of the purchase price. The assessing officer's finding is that the firewood was delivered at the depots owned by the assessee at different places and therefore, the purchases price of the firewood was inclusive of the transport charges.

( 4 ) THE Tribunal, while disagreeing with the finding given by the assessing officer, took the view that the transport charges were incurred by the sellers as incidental or subsequent to the sale. It appears, the Tribunal has looked into the terms of the agreement between the parties. We do not have the benefit of that agreement nor a cop of the agreement is on record. We may, however, proceed on the basis of the finding recorded by the Tribunal. The Tribunal has observed that there is a stipulation in the agreement for delivering the firewood at the assessee's depot. The tribunal, however, has stated that that by itself is no ground to infer that the sale was completed only upon such delivery. The Tribunal has stated :

". . . . . . . . . If that were the stipulation between the appellant and the sellers, the terms about the supply of firewood from the places of felling trees and the term for payment of transportation charges separately would not have found mention in the agreement of purchase. We are convinced that the transportation of firewood from the forest to the appellant's depot was incidental or subsequent to the sale and that the cost incurred for transport was not meant to be included in the price of the goods purchased by the appellant. The deduction claimed by the appellant is justly allowable. "

( 5 ) MR. Rajendra Babu, the learned counsel for the State, is very critical about the findings recorded by the Tribunal. He urged that eve though freight charges are separately shown in the bills, the purchaser is not entitled to that deduction since he has to part with that amount also to the seller for getting the goods at the depot. The learned counsel also relied upon the definition of the word "turnover" in support of his contention. The definition of "turnover" under section 2 (1) (v) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act reads :

" (v) 'turnover' means the aggregate amount for which goods are bought or sold, or supplied or distributed by a dealer, either directly or through another, on





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top