SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Kar) 74

K.S.PUTTASWAMY
MYSORE ACETATE AND CHEMICAL CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE, MYSORE – Respondent


( 1 ) M/s. The Mysore Acetate and Chemical Co. Ltd. , a Public Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act, which is the petitioner before this Court, is inter alia engaged in the business of manufacturing a Chemical called "acetic anhydride" in its factory situated near mandya City of District Mandya, which is used as a drug intermediate by the drug manufacturers of the country. "acetic anhydride" as a Chemical is eligible to excise duty under tariff Item No. 68 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (Central Act 1 of 1944 ).

( 2 ) IN exercise of the powers conferred on it by sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) the Government of India in its Notification No. 62/78-C. E. , dated 1st March, 1978 (annexure B), has exempted all drugs, medicines, pharmaceuticals and drug intermediates not elsewhere specified from payment of excise duty under the Act. Ever since then, acetic anhydride manufactured by the petitioner and supplied to the drug manufacturers as a drug intermediate had been treated by the excise authorities as exempted from payment of excise duty under the Act.

( 3 ) NOTWITHSTANDING the above, the Super



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top