SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Kar) 148

P.P.BOPANNA
JYOTHI HOME INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE writ petitions are disposed of by a common order since they relate to a notification issued by the State Government under the provisions of S. 3 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (in short the Act ).

( 2 ) W. P. No. 20889 of 1982, though not fixed for hearing, was brought up for hearing at the request of the learned counsel, Mr. Holla, for the petitioner therein who has also appeared in some of the connected writ petitions listed for hearing.

( 3 ) THE workmen benefited by the notification were permitted to come on record in these petitions as additional respondents and I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for the workmen, Mr. M. C. Narasimhan, and the learned Government Advocate.

( 4 ) THE petitioners are owners of beedi factories. They manufacture and sell beedies within the state of Karnataka. Under Annexure-A filed in W. P. s. Nos. 2309 to 2313 of 1982, the government of karnataka,. e. , the 1st respondent therein, issued the impugned notification under clause (b) of sub-s. (1) of S. 3 read with sub-s. (1) of S. 5 of the Act. This was done in supersession of the notification dated 28th March, 1979, in order to revise with





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top