SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Kar) 147

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, P.A.KULKARNI
H. MOHAMED KHAN – Appellant
Versus
ANDHARA BANK LTD. – Respondent


JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been preferred by the legal representatives of the original defendant-3 challenging the judgment and decree dated March 22, 1974, made against them in O. S. No. 86 of 1969 by the Second Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore City.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT-1, Andhra Bank Ltd. since nationalised and now called as the Andhra Bank Ltd. since nationalised and now called as the Andhra Bank ("the Bank") sued defendants 1 to 3 to recover a sum of Rs. 1,63,330/- on the following allegations : that defendant-1 Seth Menghraj Parasuram ("parasuram") was having financial accommodation with the Bank under various sets of accounts. As security for the amounts advanced he has endorsed promissory notes and other securities in favour of the Bank executed in his favour of his customers. On April 4, 1966, defendant-2 Abdul Jabbar executed a promissory notes in favour of Parasuram along with a consideration receipt agreeing to pay on demand to him or to his order the sum of Rupees 1,20,000/- together with interest thereon at the rate of one per cent per mensem. For valuable consideration received, that promissory note was also endorsed in favour of the Bank. The Bank ha


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top