SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 104

M.RAMA JOIS, M.K.SRINIVASA IYENGAR
GURUSIDDAPPA NURANDAPPA UPPIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


RAMA JOIS, J.

( 1 ) IN this batch of 22 writ petitions filed by the forest contractors, the following questions of law arise for consideration :

" (i) Whether section 98a of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), inserted into it by the Karnataka Forest (Amendment) Act, 1976, with effect from 24th december, 1975, which imposes a tax called forest development tax on the consideration paid for the forest produce disposed of by the State Government, is unconstitutional ?

(ii) Whether the tax imposed by section 98a of the Act which came into force from 24th december, 1975, is leviable on the balance of the amount of consideration due and paid after that date, in respect of the sale of forest produce concluded before 24th December, 1975 ?"

( 2 )

(i) Section 98a was introduced into the Act by the Karnataka Forest (Amendment) ordinance, 1975, promulgated by the Governor, in the first instance. Subsequently, the ordinance was replaced by Amendment Act 15 of 1976. Section 98a reads as follows : "98a. Levy of forest development tax.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, in respect of forest produce disposed of by the State Government by sale or






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top