SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 107

G.N.SABHAHIT
MYSORE MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE material facts are these: The petitioner, a Partnership firm engaged in the manufacture of plastic tops and laminations imported and installed a Dixon Pilot Quoting Machine and an Air dryer in the Year 1973. The respondent Karnataka State Electricity Board sanctioned energy to the said installation subject to an authorised load of 98 HP and serviced the same with effect from 15-9-1973. It also fixed the monthly minimum charges payable on that basis. The petitioner has also averred that the respondent-2 never provided the required 200a fuses at their pole.

( 2 ) IT is further averred in the writ Petition that the 2nd respondent in the writ Petition arbitrarily disconnected the power to the petitioner on false and trumped up charges on 6-6-74 and the petitioner immediately appealed to the Chairman on 7-6-1974 and the Chairman appointed the chief Engineer (South) to inspect and give his findings. The Chief Engineer, by his report dt. 30-8-1974 gave his findings exonerating the petitioner and recommended re-connection. But, the board for the reasons best known to it did not give the re-connection. The petitioner was forced to file writ petition No. 1442/75, on the file of th





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top