SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Kar) 84

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent


CHANDRAKANTARAJ URS, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONER Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is an assessee under the IT Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act.)

( 2 ) FOR the asst. yr. 1970-71 relating to the financial year ending 31-3-1969, the petitioner filed an appeal before the AAC of It against the assessment order of the ITO. The appeal was on several grounds relating to several aspects of the assessment order with which the assessee was aggrieved. The appeal came to be partly allowed and partly disallowed by the AAC by his order dt. 27-10-1976. Petitioner assessee filed an appeal against the order of the AAC, to the extent the appeal was disallowed, before the Tribunal at Bangalore. The appeal before the Tribunal came to be withdrawn with the permission of the Tribunal on 9-5-1977 and on 17-5-1977 a revision application came to the filed u/s 264 of the Act before the CIT, Karnataka, Bangalore the respondent herein - against the order of the AAC to the extent the assessee petitioner was dissatisfied with that order. In the meanwhile the Department had filed an appeal before the tribunal against the order of the AAC in so far as related to some aspects of the success of the assessee. Tha












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top