SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Kar) 194

M.K.SRINIVASA IYENGAR
BANGALORE MOTOR ACCESSORIES – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, BANGALORE CITY DIVISION, – Respondent


SRINIVASA IYENGAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petition-firm is a registered dealer under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act. Among other articles, it deals in rexine cloth. An assessment to sales tax, for the year 1976-77,. e. , from 24th october, 1976, to 11th November, 1977, was made by the Commercial Tax Officer. The Deputy commissioner of Commercial Taxes being of the view that the assessment in regard to certain matters was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, issued a notice under section 21 (4) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act to the petitioner to show cause why the assessment should not be revised. The notice was in relation to two items. The Commercial Tax Officer had made an assessment at a concessional rate under section 5 (3-A) in respect of certain goods supplied to m/s. Bangalore Body Builders. He had done so on the basis of the production of the declaration in form No. 37 issued by the said purchaser. But the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial taxes was of the view that this is erroneous as according to him the goods worth Rs. 590. 40 purchased by M/s. Bangalore Body Builders had been used in the works contract. The other item referred to in the notice was a turnover of Rs




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top