SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Kar) 55

A.NARAYANA PAL
D. PADMARAJA SETTY – Appellant
Versus
GYANACHANDRAPPA – Respondent


( 1 ) THE property In suit, out of which these Revision Petitions arise, belonged to two brothers dasarath and Tukkappa. The former died first. After the death of Tukappa also, leaving only his widow Padmavathamma, one of the sons of Padmavathamma filed a suit for partition and delivery to him of a half share in the property. Padmavathamma had brought up her brother's daughter Janawa as her foster daughter.

( 2 ) DURING the pendency of the suit, Padmavathamma died. Both Padama-vathamma as well as her foster daughter Janawa were murdered on the game night.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff filed I. A. No. VI for bringing on record his brothers because himself and his said brothers were the nearest intestate heirs of Padmavathamma under Section 15 of the Hindu succession Act. Janawa's parents filed I. A. No. VII to come on record as legal representatives of deceased Padmavathamma, on the ground that Padmavathamma had left a registered will bequeathing all her estate in favour of Jannavva and that after the death of Janawa they were the persons entitled to the estate as the nearest heirs to Janawa.

( 4 ) THE will was a registered one and the same was proved by the evidence of the scribe, an atte










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top