SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Kar) 29

B.VENKATASWAMI, T.K.TUKOL
B. B. MALI PATIL – Appellant
Versus
SREEDAR RAO PATIL – Respondent


TUKOL, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution praying for the issue of a writ of Certiorari quashing the order passed by the Mysore State Transport Appellate Tribunal in appeal No. 554 of 1966.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner Is that ho was plying a Stage Carriage Service from Koppal to kawloor via Halligere, Wadegenhal, Handral, Mianalli and Alwandi. He had filed an application on September 80, 1965, before the Regional Transport Authority, Raichur, for variation of the existing route and timings. The change in the route was that instead of going from Wadegenhal to Mainalli via Handral, it should be via Hiresindogi. The application was duly notified on october 28, 1965 inviting objections before November 30, 1965. The date of hearing was december 15, 1965. No objections were received in time. The 1st Respondent filed his objections on January 10, 1966; but the same were rejected on the ground that they were not submitted within the notified date. The Regional Transport Authority, thereafter considered the merits of the petitioner's prayer and granted the variations in the route as well as in the timings. The 1st Respondent preferred an a

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top