A.R.SOMNATH IYER, AHMED ALI KHAN
TEJANASA TULJANSA BHANDAGE – Appellant
Versus
FIRST COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, II CIRCLE, GADAG – Respondent
( 1 ) A certain Kabadi who was carrying on business as a radio and cloth dealer at Gadag was a dealer under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1957. On 28th February, 1963, the whole of his business was purchased by Bhandage who is the petitioner in these four revision petitions. When he made the purchase, Kabadi's turnover for the period between 1st April, 1962, and 30th June, 1962, had been assessed to sales tax by an order of assessment made on 6th December, 1962. The turnover relating to the years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62 formed the subject-matter of subsequent assessment proceedings in which assessments were respectively made in the years 1963, 1964 and 1965. When the tax and penalty payable by Kabadi were not paid by the petitioner, an application was presented to the Judicial Magistrate, Gadag, under section 13 (3) of the Act for their recovery. The petitioner's objection to that recovery which rested on more than one ground was negatived, and these revision petitions are directed against the orders made by the magistrate in that way.
( 2 ) MR. Srinivasan advanced three arguments on behalf of the petitioner. The brat was that since the orders of assessment in r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.